The increasing closeness between President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud of Somalia and Ismail Omar Guelleh, the long-serving dictator of Djibouti, is being met with skepticism, amid rising worries that Guelleh’s influence over Mohamud could introduce autocratic practices into Somalia’s delicate governance.
The growing alliance between the two leaders, which has become a topic of public debate, has raised alarms and cast doubts on President Mohamud’s approach to governance and the potential consolidation of power.
Observers and citizens alike are expressing concerns over the possibility of Guelleh’s “dictatorship playbook” influencing the Somali leader’s decision-making, potentially undermining democratic values and pushing Somalia towards autocratic rule.
There is a widespread belief that Ismail Guelleh wields significant influence over President Mohamud’s decision-making process, particularly on matters of national importance. Many are warning that this could lead to the erosion of democratic values and a potential shift towards autocracy in Somalia.
Given Somalia’s history of political instability and governance challenges, safeguarding democratic institutions is of utmost importance.
FAMILIAL TIES OVER MERITOCRACY
The alarming similarities between the two leaders’ actions have sparked concerns over nepotism and transparency in their respective administrations.
President Mohamud, who assumed office 23 months ago, has drawn attention for his decision to award a significant number of government contracts and key positions to close relatives and allies.
His governance approach mirrors that of Guelleh, the long-standing authoritarian leader of Djibouti, who has been criticized for placing his family members in strategic governmental roles, this hindering the inclusion of diverse perspectives and hinder social progress.
The issue of nepotism has been a concern in Somalia since President Mohamud came to power, with its presence often entwined with allegations of cronyism and abuse of power.
In Somalia, where institutional development has been a challenge, the recent developments raise questions about the country’s commitment to establishing a fair and accountable government.
Similarly, in Djibouti, President Guelleh’s decision to place family members in crucial government roles has drawn criticism from human rights advocates and opposition groups, who argue that such actions contribute to a lack of political pluralism and suppress dissenting voices.
STRONGMAN’S SCRIPT
President Mohamud’s close ties with Djibouti’s dictator, President Guelleh, are becoming a cause for concern regarding the future of Somalia’s nascent democracy.
The similarities between Djibouti’s autocratic regime and the potential implications for Somalia’s governance are becoming increasingly evident.
President Guelleh’s iron-fisted rule, characterized by the suppression of dissent and the restriction of democratic freedoms, has raised fears about the influence he could have on President Mohamud’s leadership style.
Somalia, a country struggling with corruption and weak institutions, faces an additional challenge due to this alliance. Skeptics are worried about the potential for power abuse within this partnership, making it an urgent issue.
Somalia’s delicate democracy, born out of years of instability and conflict, has shown signs of promise recently. The re-election of President Mohamud, hailed as a symbol of hope and a catalyst for change, brought renewed optimism to the nation.
However, doubts have started to emerge about the future trajectory of Somalia’s democratic journey with the shadow of President Guelleh’s autocratic rule looming over this alliance.
DJIBOUTI-UAE’s PLAYBOOKS
Adding to these concerns is the ongoing recruitment of thousands of new military personnel by President Mohamud’s government.
While a larger military force could potentially contribute to stabilizing the country, the involvement of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), another autocratic Arab regime and monarchy, in financing these troop trainings and supplying equipment raises an additional red flag.
Critics argue that the UAE’s support may inadvertently encourage President Mohamud to emulate the autocratic rule observed in Djibouti and the UAE.
Their concerns stem from the historical precedent of external powers exerting influence and shaping governance systems in other countries, especially fragile states such as Somalia, Yemen and Libya.
Skeptics fear that such a path could undermine the progress made towards democratization and governance reforms in Somalia.
The potential consolidation of power by President Mohamud, influenced by Guelleh’s dictatorial methods and with financial backing from the UAE, raises serious concerns about the future trajectory of Somalia.
Facebook Comments