NEWS DESK
Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud delivered a strong statement expressing disappointment with the African Union Mission in Somalia (ATMIS) troops for their lack of active involvement in combating al-Shabab militants.
Despite an ongoing military offensive across the country, the President claimed that ATMIS forces have remained confined to their military bases instead of actively assisting the Somali National Army and local militias on the ground.
During an address to newly graduated military officers in Doha, Qatar on Thursday, President Mohamud voiced frustration at ATMIS’s inaction and their unwillingness to aid the Somali forces, despite being equipped with modern military assets such as tanks and armored vehicles.
The President emphasized that this position goes against the commitment and mandate of the AU forces to address the ongoing al-Shabab insurgency, which has persisted since his re-election for a non-consecutive second term as the nation’s 10th President.
FALSE CLAIMS
During his speech, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud downplayed the significant achievements of the African Union forces in liberating swathes of territory including Mogadishu from al-Shabab.
He also overlooked the crucial role played by these forces in protecting essential installations like Villa Somalia, the President’s residence and office.
The multinational African Union forces, formerly known as AMISOM, were deployed in Somalia in 2007 when extremist groups held control over almost the entire city of Mogadishu, with only a few pockets under the fragile government’s authority.
Since then, they have engaged in a fierce battle against insurgents, resulting in a high number of casualties. Tragically, the African Union mission has become the world’s deadliest peacekeeping operation, with over 6,000 soldiers losing their lives, as reported by recent African Union casualty figures.
The president’s controversial remarks have drawn significant criticism from various quarters. Local politicians, activists, and citizens have expressed their disappointment and anger, accusing President Mohamud of disrespecting the sacrifices made by ATMIS troops who have been instrumental in stabilizing the country and combating terrorism.
In addition, the African Union and key AMISOM contributing countries, have expressed their concern over President Mohamud’s remarks.
These nations have invested substantial resources, including troops and financial aid, in the fight against extremist groups in Somalia, view the president’s statements as an affront to their commitment to the region’s security.
Many believe that the president’s comments may strain the relationship between Somalia and ATMIS, hampering future cooperation and potentially jeopardizing the progress made in the fight against extremism.
ATMIS WITHDRAWAL RISKS
As discussions about the potential withdrawal of the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) arise, the security situation in Somalia becomes increasingly worrisome, giving rise to concerns of a security crisis. The possibility of AMISOM no longer protecting vital institutions in the country presents significant risks to stability and undermines the ongoing efforts to combat extremist groups.
Amidst debates and controversies surrounding the involvement of tribal militias in the current military operations against militants, there is an increasingly concensus that a unified national army holds the key to addressing Somalia’s security challenges.
Stakeholders acknowledge the significance of a cohesive military force and emphasize the necessity of united front against common adversaries.
However, in his speech the president has has said false information regarding the Somali national Army, saying that the army have never been able to liberate and hold areas alone.
Contrary to such claims, the 14 October Brigade successfully captured the city of Merca, a coastal town, 90km north of Mogadishu and continue to maintain its security for nearly 4 years now.
In addition, Gorgor, a Turkish-trained elite forces have singlehandedly liberated and secured Barire, Awdheegle and Jannale town for nearly three years now.
These military operations were carried out with the intention of strengthening the country’s security and countering extremist elements.
DISMANTLING TROOPS
In a worrying development, the Eritrean-trained forces in Somalia continue to face considerable pressure, amid ongoing gradual disbandment, as parts of efforts to dismantle their presence.
However, military experts express deep concerns over the potential consequences of this decision believed to the works of foreign elements.
They argue that dismantling well-trained troops, who have gained invaluable training and expertise in counterinsurgency operations, could significantly weaken Somalia’s ability to defend itself and combat emerging security threats effectively.
Furthermore, this move raises questions about the Somali government’s commitment to rebuilding a capable and professional army. Reports indicate that nearly half of the 5,500 soldiers trained in Eritrea have deserted their bases since their return to Somalia.
In recent years, Somalia has received substantial international support in terms of military training and equipment, with the aim of building a strong and self-sufficient military force.
However, the decision to disband and dismantle these highly trained troops appears to contradict these efforts and undermines the progress made so far.
But many were surprised by the move given the divisive political history of the current president.
During his time in the opposition, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud played a significant role in dividing the army along clan lines and instigating multiple anti-government insurrection campaigns.
Using tribal rhetoric, he publicly called for army officers to abandon their military and police positions and join anti government clan militias.
DENIAL AND DOWNPLAYING
Despite the president’s claims of the army and commanders being undertrained, the Somali National Army (SNA) has undergone substantial reforms that have resulted in the current leadership structure.
The ongoing military offensive heavily relies on the expertise and contributions of General Odowa Yusuf Rage, Brigadier General Mohamed Tahlil Bihi, and Brigadier General Abbas Amin Ali, who have earned significant respect for their exceptional military service. These career military officers were appointed by the previous government and continue to play indispensable roles in the current operation.
The forces established under the Farmajo administration continue to demonstrate remarkable dedication and sacrifice in engaging daily battles within active combat zones.
In light of these unfolding events, it is unsettling to observe that President Mohamud has chosen to shift blame towards AMISOM, a force that operates under a legitimate mandate in Somalia, rather than addressing the fundamental issues at hand.
Furthermore, there are circulating proposals suggesting the deployment of 18,000 Non-ATMIS troops from neighboring countries, namely Ethiopia, Kenya, and Djibouti. However, some argue that this action might unintentionally strengthen the position of extremist groups like al-Shabaab.
This concern is supported by past events, such as the TPLF-led invasion into Somalia in late 2006 and the illegal incursion into Jubaland by the Kenyan Defense Forces in 2012. Both invasions resulted in the mobilization of national sentiments against foreign forces, which were perceived by the locals as occupiers.
This situation was exploited by extremist groups, including al-Shabaab, who witnessed an increase in their ranks due to non-extremist nationalists becoming angered by the presence of foreign forces in their country.
Facebook Comments